Economic order quantity (EOQ)

By: Rashid Javed | Updated on: December 7th, 2019

Definition and explanation

Economic order quantity (EOQ) is the order size that minimizes the sum of ordering and holding costs related to raw materials or merchandise inventories. In other words, it is the optimal inventory size that should be ordered with the supplier to minimize the total annual inventory cost of the business. Other names used for economic order quantity are optimal order size and optimal order quantity.

The economic order quantity is computed by both manufacturing companies and merchandising companies. Manufacturing companies compute it to find the optimal order size of raw materials inventory and merchandising companies compute it to find the optimal order size of ready to use merchandise inventory.

The ordering and holding costs

The two significant factors that are considered while determining the economic order quantity (EOQ) for any business are the ordering costs and the holding costs.

A brief explanation of both the costs is given below:

Ordering costs

The ordering costs are the costs that are incurred every time an order for inventory is placed with the supplier. Examples of these costs include telephone charges, delivery charges, invoice verification expenses and payment processing expenses etc. The total ordering cost usually varies according to the frequency of placing orders. Mostly, it is directly proportional to the number of orders placed during the year which means If the number of orders placed during the year increases, the annual ordering cost will also increase and if, on the other hand, the number of orders placed during the year decreases, the annual ordering cost will also decrease.

Holding costs

The holding costs (also known as carrying costs) are the costs that are incurred to hold the inventory in a store or warehouse. Examples of costs associated with holding of inventory include occupancy of storage space, rent, shrinkage, deterioration, obsolescence, insurance and property tax etc. The total holding cost usually depends upon the size of the order placed for inventory. Mostly, the larger the order size, the higher the annual holding cost and vice versa. The total holding cost is some time expressed as a percentage of total investment in inventory.

The economic order quantity is the level of quantity at which the combined ordering and holding cost is at the minimum level.

Relation between the ordering and holding cost:

There is an inverse relationship between ordering cost and holding cost. Keeping the annual demand constant if for example the number of orders decreases, the ordering cost will also decrease but the holding cost will rise and vice versa.


Economic order quantity formula

The following formula is used to determine the economic order quantity (EOQ):


  • D = Demand per year
  • Co = Cost per order
  • Ch = Cost of holding per unit of inventory


The material DX is used uniformly throughout the year. The data about annual requirement, ordering cost and holding cost of this material is given below:

  • Annual requirement: 2,400 units
  • Ordering cost: $10 per order
  • Holding cost: $0.30 per unit

Required: Determine the economic order quantity (EOQ) of material DX using above data.


The economic order quantity for material DX is 400 units. Now, we can compute the number of orders to be placed per year, annual ordering cost, annual holding cost and combined annual ordering and holding cost as follows:

Number of orders per year

= Annual demand/EOQ
= 2,400 units/400 units
= 6 orders per year

Ordering cost

= Number or orders per year × Cost per order
= 6 orders × $10
= $60

Holding cost

= Average units × Holding cost per unit
= (400/2) × 0.3
= $60

Combined ordering and holding cost at economic order quantity (EOQ):

= Ordering cost + Holding cost
= $60 + $60
= $120

Notice that both ordering cost and holding cost are $60 at economic order quantity. The holding cost and ordering cost at EOQ tend to be the same.

Tabular determination of economic order quantity (EOQ)

Under tabular approach of determining economic order quantity, the combined ordering and holding cost is computed at different number of orders and their respective order quantities. This approach is also known as trial and error approach of determining economic order quantity.

This approach is illustrated below using the same data as used in the above example:

*Average units × Holding cost per unit: 1,200 units × 0.30 = $360

Notice that the quantity of 400 units with 6 annual orders and a combined ordering and holding cost of $120 is the most economical quantity to order. Other order quantities that result in more or less than six orders per year are not so economical. For example, if only one order for the whole annual requirement of 2,400 units is placed, the combined ordering and holding cost comes to $370 which is far higher than the cost at economic order quantity of 400 units.

The application of tabular approach is not common as it is more time consuming as compared to formula approach. Moreover, in some situations, it provides only an estimate of economic order quantity and is therefore not as accurate as the formula approach. If a question regarding economic order quantity is asked in the examination, the students should avoid using tabular (trial and error) approach; rather they should use the formula approach which is comparatively less time consuming and which also provides the most accurate answer.

Example 2

The John Sports Inc. purchases tennis balls at $20 per dozen from its suppliers. The John Sports will sell 34,300 dozens of tennis balls evenly throughout the year. The total cost to handle a purchase order is $10. The insurance, property tax and rent for each dozen tennis balls in the average inventory is $0.40. The company wants a 5% return on average inventory investment.


  1. Compute the economic order quantity.
  2. Compute the total annual inventory expenses to sell 34,300 dozens of tennis balls if orders are placed according to economic order quantity computed in part 1.


1. Economic order quantity:

*$0.40 + ($20 × 5/100) = $1.4

2. Total annual inventory expenses to sell 34,300 dozens of tennis balls:

= Annual ordering cost + Annual holding cost
= (Number of orders × Cost per order) + (Average units × Holding cost per unit)
= (*49 orders × $10) + [(700/2) × 1.4]
= $490 + $490
= $980

*Number of orders to be placed: 34,300/700 = 49 orders

Underlying assumptions of economic order quantity (EOQ)

The computation of economic order quantity (EOQ) is based on the following assumptions:

  1. The total number of units to be consumed during the period is known with certainty.
  2. The total ordering cost remains constant throughout the period.
  3. The inventory cost remains constant throughout the period.
  4. There are no cash or quantity discounts available.
  5.  The whole quantity of ordered inventory is delivered in one batch.
  6. The optimal quantity for each invariable or stock item is computed separately.
  7. The lead time does not fluctuate and the order is received on time with the total order quantity.

The assumptions described above are also known as the limitations of economic order quantity (EOQ).

15 Comments on Economic order quantity (EOQ)

    Found this material useful. The presentation simplified eoq and made it readily understandable. Thanks for the good work.

  2. Kingsley... +2348102189259

    Nice write ups


    Thanks for the explicit explanation.

  4. Zuko

    You have put the Economic Order Quantity in an understandable way as possible thank you very much

  5. Shumaila

    Maximum consumption 600 units per month
    Minimum consumption 100 units per month
    Normal consumption 300 units per month
    Yearly consumption 3600 units
    Storage cost 50% of stock value
    ORdering cost 400 per order
    Price of material 64 per unit

    Calculate average stock level
    Minimum stock level nd maximum stock level and re order level?

    can u hlp.m

    1. Bangashi sambwa

      Thank you for the simplified explanation

  6. Carl Fernandes

    There is no mention of lead time , please include the same

  7. Amihere Margaret

    Average usage =20 units per day
    minimum usage=120 units per day
    maximum usage=260 units per day
    lead time 20-26 days

    demand is 25 per working days, ordering cost $150 per order,items cost $3 and carrying cost are 12% per year.there are 250 working day in a year.

    calculate: re- order level
    minimum level
    maximum level
    economic order quantity
    please help me .


    what is the implication of price increase or price fluctuations on the EOQ?

  9. Melese Beredo

    annual consumption 36000
    purchase price per units 5400
    order cost per order 1500
    inventory carrying cost is 20% of the average inventory
    calculate economic order quantity

  10. Walter Gelayan Anak Gena

    Useful for my Assignment (Operation Management)

  11. Ewhe Felicia

    Minimum lead time =4weeks
    Maximum lead time=6weeks
    Cost of material=#20per unit
    Maximum usage per week=15 unit
    Manimum usage per week=50 unit
    Minimum usage per week=50 unit
    Yearly usage =4000 unit
    Carrying cost=5% of stock value
    Ordering cost=#3 per order
    Plz if u can help me out, am having the exams tomorrow and I don’t have any idea

  12. Izang Marshal

    Please I need an urgent help with the following problem:

    The demand for an item is 44,000 units per annum, the ordering cost is $50 per order. The holding cost per item is $2.5 per annum and the price per unit of the item is $10. The supplier offers a discount rate of 3% for orders between 10,000 to 31,999 and 8% discount rate for orders of 32,000 and above.

    You’re required to determine the best quantity to order

  13. Hawau

    Thanks so much
    Pls can you help me with this
    The annual requirement of an item is 72000 units, each costing #36. Every order cost #1200 and inventory carting charges are 20% of the average inventory per annum.
    1. Solve for EOQ using the formula
    2. Calculate total inventory cost

  14. imtiaz

    worderfull job, its a good job

Leave a comment