# Variable costing versus absorption costing

Explain the difference between variable and absorption costing. How unit product cost is computed under two methods?

Variable and absorption are two different costing methods. Almost all successful companies in the world use both the methods. Variable costing and absorption costing cannot be substituted for one another because both the systems have their own benefits and limitations.

These costing approaches are known by various names. For example, variable costing is also known as direct costing or marginal costing and absorption costing is also known as full costing or traditional costing.

The information provided by variable costing method is mostly used by internal management for decision making purposes. Absorption costing provides information that is used by internal management as well as by external parties like creditors, government agencies and auditors etc.

## Computation of unit product cost under two methods:

Under absorption costing system, the product cost consists of all variable as well as all fixed manufacturing costs i.e., direct materials, direct labor and factory overhead (FOH). But when variable costing system is used, the fixed cost (both manufacturing and non-manufacturing) is treated as a period or capacity cost and therefore not included in the product cost.

Following exhibition summarizes the difference between variable costing and absorption costing:

Variable versus absorption costing

For further clarification of the concept, consider the following examples:

## Example 1

Peter company manufactures and sells 5000 units of product X per year . Suppose one unit of product X requires the following costs:

Direct materials: \$5 per unit
Direct labor: \$4 per unit
Variable manufacturing overhead: \$1 per unit
Fixed manufacturing overhead: \$20,000 per year

The unit product cost of Peter company under two costing approaches can be computed as follows:

Absorption Costing: \$5 + \$4 + \$1 + \$4* = \$14

Variable Costing: \$5 + \$4 + \$1 = \$10

* \$20,000 / 5,000

Notice that the fixed manufacturing overhead cost has not been included in the unit cost under variable costing system but has been included under absorption costing system. This is the primary difference between variable and absorption costing.

Let’s take another example.

## Example 2

Sunshine company produces and sells only washing machines. The company uses variable costing for internal reporting and absorption costing for external reporting. The data  for the year 2022 is given below:

Direct materials: \$150/unit
Direct labor: \$45/unit
Fixed manufacturing overhead: \$160,000 per year
Fixed marketing and administrative expenses: \$110,000 per year
Variable marketing and administrative expenses: \$15/unit sold

Company produced and sold 8,000 machines during the year 2022.

Required: Compute the unite product cost under variable costing and absorption costing.

(Try to solve on your own before seeing the solution)

### Solution:

*\$160,000 / 8,000 Units = \$20

Note: Marketing and administrative expenses are period costs and are not relevant in the computation of unit product cost.

2 Comments on Variable costing versus absorption costing
1. Sonto

There is a fine line, however clear that, only fixed manufacturing cost do not form part of variable costing.

1. Dileep Kulkarni

all fixed costs (both manufacturing as well as non manufacturing) do not form part of variable cost but they are treated as period or capacity cost. Therefore, surplus is always more in variable costing income statement to that extent.